The
Guardian - March 13, 1999
interview >
Sean O'Hagan
source > guardian.co.uk
Harmony Korine is just 25, yet already he's been a film director,
novelist and skateboard champ. His work is feted and slated in
equal measure, earning him both prizes for its ground-breaking
approach and notoriety for its amoral take on American youth. Sean
O'Hagan meets a man some call the future of cinema.
::
Harmony Korine is telling
me how he cast the female lead for his new film, The Julian
Chronicles, currently shooting on location in New York. "I
was watching Hard Copy [a tabloid-style TV show], and I saw this
vision: a beautiful, totally blind figure-skater whose dream was
to be an Olympic Gold. Her performance had a strange beauty, all
skewered and distorted, her legs getting tangled up. I mean, if
I'd written that sort of thing, I'd have gotten so much flak for
being gratuitous, but here it is for real, on TV. So, I searched
her out. Took me three months, but I found her. The thing is,"
he adds ruefully, "I thought she was 14, but it turns out
she's only ten, so I've had to cut out the anal intercourse scene
between her and Ewen Bremner, who plays her hard-core
schizophrenic teacher."
In the few hours since we met, in
the bar of the Gramercy Park Hotel, Korine has regaled me, and
other open-mouthed patrons, with a succession of similarly surreal
anecdotes. I've heard, for instance, how he once had a sexual
predilection for teenage amputees, and how, during an adolescent
LSD trip, his two companions, both practising Jehovah's Witnesses,
performed a mutual circumcision ceremony. It is difficult to do
justice to Korine in print, not least because of his singular
speaking voice - an enervated, slightly high-pitched, adolescent
whine - that rises in pitch and volume when he grows animated,
which is often. He is prone to strange, spasm-like gesticulations
when emphasising a point, and has a tendency to order two drinks
at once and gulp from each of them in turn.
None of the above traits endeared
him to the wary-to-point-of-jittery bar staff, one of whom hovered
around our table obviously convinced that we were about to do a
runner at any minute. (I learn later that the hotel had only
recently re-admitted Korine, following an incident last year when
he overturned a table and chased a persistent German fan into the
street, brandishing a broken beer bottle and shouting, "Leave
me alone! I'm only a kid and I'm insane!")
By the time we repair to his
nearby apartment, he is in full, unstoppable flow. A treatise on
"the lost art of vaudeville", which began back in the
hotel bar, continued in its wildly lateral way as we ambled half a
block along Lexington, and seemed to have fizzled out in the
elevator, is suddenly, inexplicably re-ignited when he reappears
from his bedroom wearing a pair of implausibly tiny patent-leather
tap-shoes. There follows an impromptu display of tap-dancing,
Harmony Korine-style. Arms splayed, brow corrugated in
concentration, he skids and clatters across the wooden floor like
Groucho Marx on amphetamines, scrunching underfoot the unanswered
faxes that litter the room. Then, just when I am convinced it
can't get any weirder, on cue, the apartment intercom buzzes and a
dislocated voice calls out his name from four floors below.
"Oh shit," wails Korine, pacing the floor, scratching
his newly-shorn head. "I can't let this guy in. What's he
doin' here? He's just escaped from Bellevue prison."
By now, I am convinced that there
are two often conflicting personas fighting for space in the young
director's overcrowded, hyperactive head. The first is an
eccentric intellectual, who can hold forth on the failure of
French nouvelle vague cinema, quote whole chunks from Walter
Benjamin's Illuminations, then segue into a spiel on "the
essential cruelty of comedy", with particular reference to
Buster Keaton and Samuel Beckett. This Harmony Korine will often
make grandiose statements, such as, "At an early age, I
became obsessed with the transcendentalist cinema of Ozu and
Bresson, with the idea of poetic beauty as the one key truth of
film-making." The other Harmony Korine is, if anything, even
more complex: a postmodern street punk, obsessed by the more
extreme detritus of American popular culture - tabloid TV, gangsta
rap, deviant sex - and high on his own particular brand of male
machismo. Legend has it that, when a Hollywood agent boasted,
"I'll match any offer you've been made", Korine replied,
"The last guy told me I could fuck his sister. Can you match
that?"
The two personas often overlap in
surreal fashion: one moment, he is dazzling me with his erudition,
the next threatening to break my legs if I misquote him. Even more
problematic, in terms of the interview contract, is his seeming
inability, or perhaps unwillingness, to differentiate between fact
and fiction, particularly when it comes to the details of his own
life. "What you have to understand about Harmony," a
mutual friend had told me, "is that he constantly blurs the
lines between truth and fantasy. Most of the time, it's a
smokescreen to keep you guessing, like the young Dylan, but,
sometimes, he just gets carried away and doesn't seem to know he's
doing it. The odd thing is, the stories that are the most
unbelievable are often the ones that turn out to be true."
As far as I could ascertain, the
only time Korine can be trusted to be utterly truthful is when he
is talking about his work. In his apartment, where, intriguingly,
a tacked-up copy of Bob Dylan's anti-novel, Tarantula, shares
wall-space with a pre-pubescent Brooke Shields from Louis Malle's
film, Pretty Baby, and a triptych of homoerotic photographs by
Raymond Pettibone, he explains his still-embryonic assault on
mainstream cinematic values thus: "I want to change people's
expectations of what cinema can do every single time I make a
film. Cinema, as Herzog says, is still a form in its infancy, like
a baby where the first leg is sticking out of the uterus. It's
like we're only just plopping out of the womb, and, already, our
sensibilities are jaded almost beyond repair. In a sense, my whole
approach is fuelled by anger at the mediocrity of American film,
at the peddling of lies and falsity and formula, at the
denigration of this century's most powerful art form."
Because of the iconoclasm, and
often extreme nature, of his vision, this 25-year-old self-styled
artist, photographer, novelist and reigning enfant terrible of US
cinema has managed, in his short but incendiary career, to offend
more people than he has enthralled. Chances are that, if you have
heard of him at all, it was in relation to the controversy
engendered by the two feature films that have borne his name:
1996's Kids, a Larry Clark film, the screenplay for which Korine
had written when he was just 19, and 1997's Gummo, his startling
directorial debut, released in the UK last year. Both have
garnered as much condemnation as critical acclaim for their
supposedly amoral vision of a dysfunctional teenage America. One
influential critic, Janet Maslin of the New York Times, succumbed
to the sort of moral panic that attends every generation's attempt
to define itself in extremis - whether through music, fiction or
film - calling Korine a "nihilist" and dubbing Gummo
"the worst film of the year". ("She obviously
hadn't seen Three Heads In A Duffel Bag," quipped a rival
critic.)
Elsewhere, he has been hailed as
a true original whose skewered vision of the US owes more,
paradoxically, to the auteurist tradition of European cinema.
Gummo landed the Critic's Prize at both the Venice and Rotterdam
film festivals, and he has impressed an influential handful of his
cinematic peers, most notably Gus Van Sant and the esteemed German
director, Werner Herzog, who has called Korine "the future of
American cinema". His next two feature films will be made
under the aegis of Dogme 95, the Danish film-making collective
formed by Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg, directors of
Breaking The Waves and Festen, respectively. In the pages of style
magazines such as Dazed & Confused and The Face, the young
director has been virtually canonised, albeit against his will, as
the voice of the post-slacker generation - "I'm just the
voice of Harmony," he says wearily.
This month, critical opinion will,
no doubt, be divided once more with the British publication of A
Crackup At The Race Riots, Korine's first novel - though, in this
instance, the term applies more as an adjective than a noun. For a
start, the book eschews linear narrative in favour of an
assortment of seemingly unrelated ideas, one-liners, suicide
notes, borrowed quotes, lists and cod-aphorisms. An anti-novel, if
you like, that wilfully defies literal meaning. Korine, who cites
the designer Charles Eames's ethos of "the unified aesthetic"
when describing his overall vision, sees himself as "a
contemporary collage-ist", but the term "chancer"
could just as easily apply in this instance.
One chapter, Rumors, simply lists
61 semi-scurrilous one-liners: Placido Domingo likes sherbet;
Roberta Flack is scared of going to the dentist; Flavor Flav is a
classically-trained pianist; Jerry Garcia tongue-kissed his older
sister on her deathbed. Elsewhere, TS Eliot's last words -
"I'm so unlucky the mirror I broke was a black cat" -
sit side by side with the late Tupac Shakur's Ten Favourite Novels,
which include works by Freud, Goethe and Schopenhauer. Except that
Eliot never said any such thing, and Shakur's name has been
substituted for that of one of Harmony's heroes, the German film
director, Rainer Werner Fassbinder. Funny and infuriating by turns,
the book, according to Korine, "does possess an underlying
narrative of sorts, but it's more of a swervy, thin line than a
story". Which is, perhaps, why Doubleday, its US publisher,
tied itself in knots trying to market the book, describing it as
"Slacker meets James Thurber" and, even more pointlessly,
as "the ultimate postmodern video novel". In its
fragmented and encoded way, the book may well reflect the culture
that spawned it, though, as one US reviewer noted, "Korine
seems too much inside his own head to speak for anyone outside
it."
"In many ways, the term 'writer'
or, indeed, 'film-maker' is too constraining for what Harmony does,"
says Walter Donahue, his publisher at Faber. "If anything,
he's an artist in the truest, most all-embracing sense. In Gummo,
there's both an instinctive vision at work and a rigorous, formal
intelligence applied to the subject matter. He's young and still
excited by the possibilities of film-making, and he's not burdened
by the past, although he knows it inside out. He's free to invent
a new language, which is what he's in the process of doing."
Thus far, that new language has
found its most powerful expression on the screen rather than on
the page. Korine didn't go to to film school, and his interest in
film-making seems to have been engendered, at least in part, by
his somewhat unorthodox upbringing. Though the book blurb claims
that "Harmony was raised in the carnival", the truth is
more prosaic. His father, an Iranian-Jewish émigré, seems to
have travelled extensively around America, first as a hippy, then
as a boutique owner. Korine Jr was born in Bolinas, California,
and soon after the family moved to Nashville, Tennessee, where he
attended "a progressive school that catered to people who
were a little out of the ordinary".
He describes his childhood as
"solitary", and says he was "a very slow developer",
claiming not to have hit puberty till he was 16. "My dad
didn't really talk to me when I was growing up. If he was angry,
he'd whop me with a bat or throw a shoe. The other side to that
was, 'Let's go see a movie.' He preferred a form of communication
where he didn't have to actually say anything."
When the family relocated to New
York, the teenage Korine, now convinced of what he calls his
"otherness", spent an inordinate amount of time alone in
one of the city's then plentiful repertory cinemas, absorbing the
work of the European and American avant-garde, including films by
Cassavetes, Herzog, Godard and, most important in terms of his
development, Fassbinder and Alan Clark. "I'd see a Fassbinder
film, then go and get a book about him out of the library, and
find out that he was into melodrama and Douglas Sirk. Then I'd go
and seek out all of Sirk's work. That's how I figured out there
was a continuum in cinema and directing that, hopefully, I'm part
of today."
The sense of wonder he felt
during those solitary evenings has stayed with him, and, to a
degree, underpins his old-fashioned belief in cinema's enduring
power to convey wonder and astonishment. In one of his more poetic
moments, he tells me, "There is something mysterious, almost
inexplicable, about the idea of strangers coming together to sit
in the dark, in silence or in laughter, responding to a
film-maker's work. It's a sensual and a cerebral experience, which
is why video, nor any of this interactive crap, will never replace
it. I knew from a very early age - from the moment I saw the
poetry of Buster Keaton - that there is no other art form that
compares to film."
His otherness notwithstanding,
the by then 18-year-old Korine had managed to become a teenage
skateboard phenomenon, complete with corporate sponsorship, when
the photographer Larry Clark met him in New York's Washington
Square Park. Korine showed Clark a short script he had written
about a 13-year-old boy who is taken to a prostitute by his father
as a coming-of-age present. A couple of years later, Clark - who
was now so in thrall to teenage skate culture that, at 52, he was
togged out in hip-hugging baggy pants and skateboarding himself -
asked Korine to write a screenplay about his everyday life. The
result was Kids, a film described by one reeling critic - Janet
Maslin again - as "a wake-up call to America", and by
others as an extended, and vacuous, essay in amoralism. The truth
lies somewhere in between.
Three years on, Kids stands as an
ambitious but strangely soulless attempt to capture the enervated
and, yes, amoral, gestalt of a certain kind of adolescent American
inner-city reality. It follows a group of New York kids around the
city, dispassionately recording them as they take drugs, fight and
screw - lovelessly, ruthlessly, aimlessly. Underlying the often
disturbing imagery - everyone in the film looks under-age, yet
their demeanour and dialogue suggests that, though barely into
adolescence, they are hardened survivors - is a moral tale about
unsafe sex and the spread of HIV.
It was the film's deadpan tone,
detached point of view and provocative style more than its subject
matter that seemed to upset many critics, who accused Clark - and,
by proxy, Korine - of exploitation rather than documentation. In
the US, Republican Bob Dole described it as "a nightmare of
depravity", while here, Social Democrat MP, Emma Nicholson,
called it "disgusting material that panders to paedophile
fantasies".
Kids, as Korine is quick to point
out, is essentially a Larry Clark film, and loaded with the
latter's usual preoccupations-cum-obsessions - casual violence,
drug-taking and warped adolescent sexuality. "For me, it was
just a job for hire, y'know?" shrugs Korine, still an
adolescent himself when he "banged out" the screenplay
in just three weeks. He now seems less than interested in
rekindling an old controversy. "I would have made a very
different film from Larry's. In fact, I'd have made it more
non-judgmental and detached. But there is a morality there. I was
reading a lot of Greek tragedy at the time, and I was obsessed
with the idea of the sins of the fathers, of everything coming
round. It's just not the usual kind of black-and-white Hollywood
moral tale, where good triumphs and everyone learns a life lesson.
Where I grew up, those rules did not apply."
If Kids showed that Korine had an
ear for dialogue, a natural aptitude for casting unknowns - the
much-acclaimed Chloë Sevigny, his erstwhile girlfriend and
ongoing muse, made her debut in the film before going on to star
in Trees Lounge and The Last Days Of Disco) - and an ability to
write from the inside about the more transgressive elements of US
youth culture, his directorial debut in 1997, Gummo, was nothing
short of a revelation. Arguably the most original film of the
Nineties, it conjures up an at times nightmarish vision of a
dysfunctional middle-America that, outside of the Sixties
photography of Duane Michaels and, significantly, Larry Clark, had
not been documented before. Blocked on bad drugs, in thrall to
gangsta rap and death-metal, and drawn (through boredom rather
than desire) to loveless sex, Korine's characters are the
trailer-park, white-trash youth of middle America, whose dead-end
lifestyle he records without judgment or idealisation.
Shot near Nashville, which
doubles for Xenia, Ohio, a small town devastated by a tornado back
in 1970, it opens with footage of the aftermath of the storm,
including one unforgettable image of a dog impaled on a satellite
antenna. "The metaphor of the tornado freed me up, and I
began to think in terms of pure images and scenarios. Anything but
plot. Plot disgusts me. Real life doesn't have plots." Using
hand-held video and Super 8, as well as stop-action photography
and Polaroids, Korine created an often wilfully jarring but
utterly mesmerising montage of a society where, as he puts it,
"none of the normal rules apply". Employing non-actors
alongside relative unknowns, he manages to pull up short all our
preconceived notions of film-making, merging various older genres
- home movies, fly-on-the-wall documentaries, the German realist
cinema of Fassbinder - into a new form that effortlessly
transcends the sum of its parts. What is initially disturbing
about Gummo is how the camera seems to be recording
"real" people in unrehearsed situations: two skinhead
brothers who, seemingly unable to converse, simply punch each
other in turn in a ritual test of endurance; a retarded girl
lovingly shaves her eyebrows in front of a mirror in order to
"look more pretty".
"What I'm concerned with is
the presentation of reality," says Korine. "I present my
films as real and organic, while, simultaneously, I'm actually
manipulating everything you see. Gummo might look in places like
fly-on-the-wall documentary, but it was mapped out, scene by scene,
though more as a montage than as a linear narrative. I want people
to feel like the images fell out of the sky. Ultimately, I'm a
trickster."
Gummo's narrative, what there is
of it, follows two paint-sniffing protagonists as they eke out a
living shooting cats to sell to a local butcher. Forrest Gump it
is not. Perhaps because the film does not conform to any of the
usual cinematic narrative genres - rites-of-passage, loss of
innocence, redemption through action - or offer anything remotely
resembling a moral subtext, it was difficult to finance. Harvey
Weinstein, the influential head of Miramax, which had funded Kids,
baulked at the idea of a youth-oriented film that included teenage
prostitution, transvestism and cat killing. In the end, Cary Woods,
a Hollywood heavyweight who had produced a string of successful
genre pics, including Copland and Scream, raised private funding
to make the film through Ted Turner's FineLine, which had
previously courted controversy with David Cronenberg's Crash.
Woods has since said that he will back any film Korine wants to
make, so great is his belief in the young director's ability to
"create a new kind of cinema".
"I still feel sore that
Gummo was dismissed by mainstream American critics for all the
wrong reasons," says Woods. "There was certainly a
generational and moral misunderstanding of what Harmony was trying
to do. I got the feeling that many metropolitan critics shared a
moral-cum-political consensus: they either didn't believe that the
America he portrayed existed, or, more likely, they didn't want it
shown. That said, anyone with even the slightest grasp of
cinematic artistry should have seen that we were dealing with a
fresh, new talent here. I've produced 14 films and, to be honest,
Harmony possesses the kind of ambition that could be dangerous in
an artist with less talent. He sets out in each film to do
something entirely new and visionary. Even when he doesn't pull it
off, his boldness is breathtaking."
Yet, in pursuing his singular
vision, Korine does, almost as part of his artistic raison d'être,
court moral outrage. His employment of non-actors in Gummo,
particularly the casting of a Down's Syndrome sufferer in the role
of a retarded teenage prostitute, led to inevitable accusations of
exploitation. "I think that notion is, of itself, ridiculous,"
says Korine. "For a start, it suggests that people with
handicaps are too stupid to know what a movie is. Is it
exploitation to use someone with an illness to play someone with
an illness? Or is it exploitation to get Dustin Hoffman or Tom
Hanks to fake it? I mean, you won't see any slobber on Tom Hanks's
face, no blood or shit on his underpants. What you will see is the
lovable Hollywood-style eccentric schizophrenic, all exaggerated
ticks and twists. That's real exploitation. That's real ego."
In one scene, one of the central
characters, Solomon (played by the strangely captivating Jacob
Reynolds), bonds with the girl in a moment of non-sexual intimacy
and, in the process, Korine turns a potentially gratuitous
interlude into the film's most tender moment. "It would have
been so easy to be sleazy," he grins, "but it's much
more challenging to set that up and then go off in the opposite
direction. People never credit me for that, because they're too
busy complying with the ongoing Gumpification of cinema and of
life. America simply isn't ready for realism. It wants the simple
message spelled out in big letters. When I read the critics' line
that there is no morality in my films, I think, 'Where do these
people live?' Where I come from, people do not pay for their sins
in an obvious way, and people do get away with doing bad stuff.
Plus, morality is relative, anyway. What's bad to you and me might
not be bad to a kid trapped in a violent family in a dead-end town.
If your father beats up on your mother every night and you witness
that from a very early age, you can get inured to the pain and
suffering, and then start to think, 'This is how things are.' If
that's how you're raised, what's the first thing you're gonna do
when you get married at 18?"
Latent violence crackles like
static through the film's disconnected narrative, but its most
explosive moment occurs when an enraged redneck batters a
steel-framed chair out of shape in a confined, and crowded, room.
Though no one is hurt, the scene has a visceral power that jolts
the viewer in a way that the choreographed violence of a Tarantino
or Scorsese film no longer can.
"The main thing I learned in
making Gummo was never to say, 'Cut!'" says Korine, giving
some insight into his unorthodox methodology. "If you tell
the actors what to do up to a point, then just keep shooting after
the scene is supposedly finished, there's often a chemistry that
occurs that can make a scene explode and burn. I love that. You
see it all the time in Alan Clark's films; the notion that a scene
could begin or end anywhere. His films are like life. They just go
on. They don't really start and end like other films. He
understood the randomness of life. That's where I want to go. The
totally-scripted film is over as a format as far as I'm concerned.
The screenplay format hasn't changed in essence since day one, and
it's become an anachronism in many ways."
For his new film, The Julian
Chronicles, he has dispensed with a screenplay altogether, in
favour of an extended treatment; scenes are blocked out and
briefly discussed with the actors, then shot with as much energy
and chemistry as possible. Featuring Sevigny, again, Werner
Herzog, Ewen Bremner and Chrissie Kobylak, the aforementioned
blind figure-skater, it is the first Korine film to be made under
the Dogme 95 manifesto, which insists that members adhere to ten
creative tenets to ensure a new kind of honesty and purity in
film-making - these include filming in natural light, shooting
scenes only in chronological sequence and using hand-held cameras.
"I've signed the Dogme vow
of chastity," says Korine, clearly proud to be directing the
collective's first US film, "because it makes perfect sense
to me. One of the things that's killing films - apart from the
idiots who make them - is that it's an elitist medium. New digital
video technology challenges all that. That's why the big studios
hate it. Video is a new psychology as much as anything - it's
cheap; you don't have to have a big, obtrusive and impersonal crew;
and you have the freedom to shoot for as long as you like on as
many cameras as you like. It's liberating - it takes the so-called
mystery out of directing."
The onus, though, is on the
actors. Bremner, best known for his role as Spud in Trainspotting,
worked in a New York psychiatric rehabilitation centre for the
criminally insane for six weeks in preparation for his role as a
man going through the first stages of schizophrenia, a part based
on Korine's uncle. "It's been a challenge all right,"
says Bremner, "mainly because, at Harmony's insistence, it's
all coming together at the last minute. I mean, there's no
scripted dialogue, just blocked-out scenes where we can improvise
and get to the heart of the thing. You hardly know from day to day
what's going to be shot or how. It's scary and exhilarating, and
I'd probably be shitting myself if it wasn't a Harmony Korine
movie."
I ask him if the volatile Korine
is easy to work with. "Well, I guess some people mightn't
think so. He's totally uninhibited and totally rigorous. Every
scene is mapped out in his head. It took me a while to figure out
how he can be so spontaneous and so disciplined, but I guess it's
just down to self-belief and purity of vision. It's a rare gift,
but he has it."
Korine is also engaged on a more
protracted, and potentially problematic, Dogme project, entitled
Fight: "The premise of the film is that I go up to the
biggest men I can find and taunt them until they beat up on me.
Basically, I have to say whatever it takes to make the guy throw
the first punch. My cameraman, who's usually across the street,
has got to keep filming unless it looks like I'm gonna die."
Ignoring my look of disbelief, he grows more animated as he
describes the fights that have already been recorded. "The
one I had with two Arab taxi drivers was brutal, man. Then, there
was the one with the bouncer at Stringfellows, who jumped on my
legs and broke my ankle." He pulls down his sock to show an
ugly protrusion where a bone has not set properly. "The video
footage of that one is exceptional."
Wondering if, perhaps, this is
one of his moments of slippage from fact into fantasy, I later ask
his fellow film-maker and friend, Oran, if Fight is for real.
"Oh, he told you about that, did he? Yeah, it's for real all
right. I saw him after one fight and he was badly bashed up. He'd
been to hospital for concussion, his ribs were cracked and his
face was a mess. It's disturbing but, y'now, that's Harmony. He's
a, how shall I put it, very complex guy."
Indeed. Thus far, it turns out,
Korine has been beaten up four times and arrested twice for his
art, but, to his dismay, he has only about 13 minutes of footage
in the can for his troubles. "I kinda overlooked the fact
that fights don't last very long, and how damaging it is when
someone really beats you up. My hospital bills are soaring, plus I
can't get arrested a third time or I'll go to jail." His
intention, though, is to fight "every demographic in New York
- Italians, Puerto Ricans... and I've got to find an aggressive
Jew like myself. Jews don't like to fight, they just curse you out
in Yiddish. I want to find a big, butch motorcycle dyke, too."
When I ask Korine to explain the
reasoning behind this extreme, even by his standards, piece of
cinematic performance art, he goes off on another wildly lateral
monologue about "the essential cruelty of comedy", and
how he wants "to make the funniest film ever made, like
Buster Keaton makes a snuff movie". Perhaps sensing that I am
genuinely disturbed by both his masochism and his sick sense of
humour, he grows serious: "Look, I've always gotten in fights.
It's because I'm a runt. I'm so little, I'd always get smashed.
Then, I started to like fighting. I started to get off on being
punched. I like the pain. I identify it with some kind of love.
Ultimately, I think violence is really necessary. It's one of the
ways I keep myself from not killing myself, because I have so much
anger inside me."
And, there, perhaps, is the rub.
Right now, Korine is the most intriguing prospect in US cinema
because of the extremity of his artistic vision.
He is also a total refusenik,
breaking virtually every formulaic rule of Hollywood film-making,
story-telling and moralising. In the process, he is creating a new
sense of the possibilities of cinema. Young and ambitious, he
possess the self-belief, and arrogance, of his years - and, God
knows, cinema needs his kind of iconoclasm now more than ever. He
is, as the critic Kurt Andersen noted in the New Yorker, "a
malcontent as young artists were once supposed to be malcontents -
not in the disengaged, everything-sucks, nothing-matters fashion,
but fired up with specific and impolitic impatience at mediocrity
and wall-to-wall conformity".
And yet... and yet, there are
some strange and disturbing demons lurking beneath his angry young
punk exterior that neither film, nor indeed fiction-making of any
kind, may be capable of containing or, indeed, exorcising. Korine
is a contemporary enfant terrible in every sense of the term; a
product of, and a reaction to, a culture where dysfunctionalism
has come to be embraced as an aesthetic. Maybe the question is not
can Harmony Korine save cinema's tarnished soul, but can cinema
save his?
© Guardian Newspapers Limited
2003
|